Thursday, December 10, 2015

Why we all need an Integration Agenda

http://mowatcentre.ca/the-integration-agenda/

This is part 4 of my blog on the Need for Integration (links to the first three can be found in the references). 

I was motivated to write this blog after a colleague, Liz Glencorse, referred to the ‘Integration Agenda’ in Scotland.  The Integration Agenda (2011) is a Scottish Government initiative to integrate Health and Social Care services.  Further initiatives to develop the agenda have followed and significantly to include housing (2013).  Similar agendas have been implemented in other countries.  The picture above is from a Canadian initiative.  It has struck me how much the concept of integration has grown in influence. 

My first experience of integration as a concept was over 30 years ago in my first ‘proper’ job.  It was about enabling traumatized ‘unintegrated’ children to become ‘integrated’.  This was based on the work of Donald Winnicott (1962), the English pediatrician and psychoanalyst.  His concept states that a child is born unintegrated and becomes an integrated person, usually during infancy.  Unintegration is normally a short term developmental stage.  Traumatic experiences such as abuse and neglect can impact on a child’s development in such a way that integration isn’t achieved.  Disintegration however, can happen at any time in a person’s life.  Temporary disintegration is sometimes considered healthy. For example, following a significant loss.  It is only a problem when recovery becomes stuck or exacerbated by further difficulties.

The American Psychiatrist and Neurobiologist Daniel Siegel (2006) claims,

“The central idea of interpersonal neurobiology is that integration is at the heart of well-being.”

Confirming the centrality of integration to therapeutic work, he also states (2014) that, “We as therapists are not really ‘shrinks’; we are ‘integrators’."  I would argue that well-being in this context can be considered at the individual, relational and collective levels.  I would also add that it is the integration of these levels that is really at the heart of well-being. 

Of course the detail of what integration means is variable, but in essence the concept is increasingly recognized to be relevant on the micro and macro levels. This makes perfect sense.  It is difficult to become or remain an integrated individual in an unintegrated environment.  In an earlier blog, I mentioned Andrew Mawson the social entrepreneur, who worked on integrating health and social issues in inner city London.  This led to improved community well-being, where people began to achieve both individually and collectively.  He continued this philosophy of ‘learning how to join things up’ in the Water City Project, 

“If you join the dots, that is a new city.  And if you connect science and technology in an integrated way into that, that’s a very exciting opportunity for jobs and skills for people of East London over the next 25 years………….

The psychologist, Isaac Prilleltensky (2006) has also made this point well.   

Psychological Wellness is a psycho-ecological concept that highlights the importance of promoting favorable conditions that nurture the personal, relational and collective well-being of individuals.

Overall wellness can only be achieved through the combined presence of well-being in these three areas – the central space on the diagram represented by the W.

Steven Johnson, the best-selling author of seven books on the intersection of science, technology and personal experience, also talks about the connections between the micro and macro.  In his 2010 TED Talk, ‘Where good ideas come from’, he says, 

“The network patterns of the outside world mimic a lot of the network patterns of the internal world.” 

 

He claims that great discoveries come more out of connections rather than isolated ‘eureka’ moments and ‘encourages us to connect ideas rather than protect them’. He claims that "Chance favors the connected mind”.  It could also be argued that it favors the connected community.

Inevitably I see the relevance of integration to my work in services for traumatized children and young people.  Because traumatized children are usually in a state of unintegration or disintegration, the task of integration is at the center of the work.  Recovery from trauma involves integrating traumatic experiences into one’s personal narrative. For unintegrated children, first of all this means there must be the development of a sense of self.  Only from this can experience become integrated.  The child needs to know who he is before he can know what has happened to him.  

There are clear stages in the recovery from trauma just as there are in ordinary development. Kezelman and Stavropoulos, (2012) refer to the importance of phased treatment, first outlined by Pierre Janet in the nineteenth century,

“Phased treatment is the `gold standard’ for therapeutic addressing of complex trauma, where
  • §  Phase I is safety/stabilisation
  • §  Phase II processing
  • §  and Phase III integration.”   

 They also argue that the experience of the service as a whole, and not just the clinical intervention is part of the treatment process.  “Neural integration is not assisted – indeed is actively impeded – by unintegrated human services which are not only compartmentalised, but which lack basic trauma awareness.”

However, as integration is at the heart of general well-being, I also hope that something can be understood of the wider relevance.  Why is it important? On the micro-level of a human brain – the brain functions well when the different components are integrated (see Siegel video).  For instance, effective decision-making takes pace when the emotional and cognitive parts of the brain are connected.

The strength of intellect is undermined if it isn’t integrated with emotion. We could use an orchestra as a metaphor – the brilliance of one part will be lost if all the parts are not successfully integrated.

The same can be seen in families, teams, organizations, communities and societies.  We know this well if we enjoy team sports. Without integration any kind of development and achievement is likely to be undermined. 

However, integration doesn’t mean merged.  The distinction and difference of the constituent parts is what makes a strong whole.  It is the way that difference is managed and connected that is important.  For example, we could be living in a community where the neighboring community is different but connected, or where there is a wall separating the two.  We know which is healthier, though there may also be healthy a degree of tension between the connected parts.  The challenge for us is how to become better integrated.  A good starting point is by putting integration at the top of our agenda. 

My Scottish colleague who referred to the Integration Agenda, also remarked what a huge challenge this is.  How hard it is to connect different parts and collaborate effectively.  Again, this is true from the micro to the macro level.  The challenge can be painful, individually, relationally and collectively.  My first response, to this question was one of deflation, thinking how impossible it is!  However, in reality it is the intent and struggle to move towards integration that is important.  There is no such thing as a perfectly integrated state.  Integration is ongoing, new experiences and circumstances constantly need to be integrated. 

To bring this back to the unintegrated or disintegrated child.  He is faced with a huge task and we know that it will be painful.  We also know the potential benefits and the cost of not going on the journey of recovery.  By working on the core issue of integration ourselves we provide a model alongside the child. 

It is the model of what is going on around the child that is most helpful to him.  This includes the individuals that are closest to him, the relationships around him as well as the wider environment.  If we are focused on integrating our own experiences, integrating better with our colleagues, between our departments, with the wider community and society – we are providing a model for health. 

The way in which the concept of integration is becoming integrated in so many ways, is very exciting.  I agree with the point made in Bessel van der Kolk’s book (2014, p.109), that “most research is me-search”.  We are most engaged when something has an important meaning.  Bessel van der Kolk himself is a great role model for integration.  In his work he integrates, ‘developmental, biological, psychodynamic and interpersonal aspects of the impact of trauma and its treatment’.  His book ‘Psychological Trauma has been described as the first integrative text on the subject’.  http://www.confer.uk.com/biogs/biog_kolk.html

If we can connect our own ongoing need for integration to the tasks we are involved with, there is more potential for growth than by anything else we could put on the agenda.  We only need to think about the many ways in which better integration might benefit our own life and work.  If we are working on integration, development and achievement are likely outcomes.

References 

Tomlinson, P. (2015) The Need for Integration – Part 1 Leadership and Management, https://goo.gl/jEfTws

Tomlinson, P. (2015) The Need for Integration – Part 2 Integration and Connection in Well-Being and Recovery from Trauma, https://goo.gl/tlnFkM

Tomlinson, P. (2015) The Need for Integration – Part 3 Integrating and Connecting - The Essence of Trauma Recovery Environments, https://goo.gl/SHXqju

Steven Johnson (2010) TED Talk, Where Good Ideas Come From | Steven Johnson | TED Talks, https://goo.gl/iYVldv

Kezelman, C. and Stavropoulos, P. (2012) The Last Frontier: Practice Guidelines for Treatment of Complex Trauma and Trauma Informed Care and Service Delivery, Australia: Adults Surviving Child Abuse (ASCA),   http://goo.gl/t9o3lA

Andrew Mawson, Water City CIC, Connecting People, Business and Place - Water City Legacy,

Nelson, B.W., Parker, S.C. and Siegel, D.J.  (2014) Interpersonal Neurobiology, Mindsight, and Integration: The Mind, Relationships, and the Brain, in Brandt, K., Perry, B.D., Seligman, S. and Tronick, E. (Eds) Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health: Core Concepts and Clinical Practice, Washington DC, London: American Psychiatric Publishing

Prilleltensky, I. (2006) ‘Psychopolitical validity: Working with power to promote justice and wellbeing.’ Paper presented at the First International Conference of Community Psychology, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 10 June 2006.

Dan Siegel video - On Integrating the Two Hemispheres of Our Brains, https://goo.gl/sARWjq

Siegel, D.J. (2006) Series Editor’s Foreword, in, Ogden, P., Minton, K. and Pain, C. Trauma and the Body, New York: Norton

The Good Governance Institute (2001) Rethinking the integration agenda: a discussion report from the Good Governance Institute, https://goo.gl/xHW1AA

The Scottish Government (2011) The Integration of Health and Social Care, http://www.gov.scot/News/Releases/2011/12/12111418

Winnicott, D.W. (1962) “Ego Integration in Child Development”, in, The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment, Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis: London (1972)